From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LE v. SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING USA

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 12, 2008
07-CV-0086 (JS) (MLO) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 12, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-0086 (JS) (MLO).

June 12, 2008

For Plaintiff: Robert P. O'Brien, Esq., Paul Fellin, Esq., Mahon, Mahon, Kerins O'Brien, LLC, Garden City South, NY

For Defendant: Eve Irene Klein, Esq., Duane Morris LLP, New York, NY, Annette A. Idalski, Esq., Duane Morris LLP, Atlanta, GA


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Presently pending before the Court is a request for judicial approval of a proposed agreement settling a Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") dispute between Plaintiff, Tuan Le, and Defendant, SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc.

The FLSA expressly "prohibits settlement of any right to unpaid minimum wage or unpaid overtime claims by employees . . . without the supervision of the Secretary of Labor." Simel v. JP Morgan Chase, No. 05-CV-9750, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18693, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. March 19, 2007); see also 29 U.S.C. § 216(c). In the absence of supervision by the Secretary of Labor, federal courts have allowed employees to waive an FLSA claim for unpaid wages or overtime pursuant to a judicially-supervised stipulated settlement. See D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi, 328 U.S. 108, 113 n. 8, 66 S. Ct. 925, 90 L. Ed. 1114 (1946); Sampaio v. Boulder Rock Creek Developers, Inc., No. 07-CV-153, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66013, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 6, 2007).

In considering an FLSA settlement submitted for approval, courts must consider whether the agreement reflects a "reasonable compromise of disputed issues [rather] than a mere waiver of statutory rights brought about by an employer's overreaching."Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1354 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Sampaio, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66013 (reviewing FLSA settlement agreement to ensure reasonableness).

Based upon the Court's review of the Settlement and the Affirmation of Robert P. O'Brien in support of the settlement, the Court finds that the settlement agreement represents a fair and reasonable resolution of a disputed issue.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LE v. SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING USA

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 12, 2008
07-CV-0086 (JS) (MLO) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 12, 2008)
Case details for

LE v. SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING USA

Case Details

Full title:TUAN LE, Plaintiff, v. SITA INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPUTING USA, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

07-CV-0086 (JS) (MLO) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 12, 2008)

Citing Cases

Zhu v. Meo Japanese Grill & Sushi Inc.

In considering whether to approve an FLSA settlement, courts consider whether the agreement “reflects a…

Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc.

Finally, in further support of its argument for confidentiality, Scholastic cites two cases from elsewhere in…