From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LE v. GENTLE DENTAL OF OREGON

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 24, 2010
09-CV-1352-AC (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2010)

Opinion

09-CV-1352-AC.

August 24, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#21) on July 29, 2010, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#4) to Compel Arbitration and stay this matter pending arbitration. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#21). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#4) to Compel Arbitration and STAYS this matter pending arbitration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LE v. GENTLE DENTAL OF OREGON

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 24, 2010
09-CV-1352-AC (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2010)
Case details for

LE v. GENTLE DENTAL OF OREGON

Case Details

Full title:HUONG LE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GENTLE DENTAL OF OREGON, an Oregon…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 24, 2010

Citations

09-CV-1352-AC (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2010)