From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 24, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered September 26, 1994, as amended, is dismissed, as that order, as amended, was superseded by the order entered February 6, 1995, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered February 6, 1995, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant-respondent is awarded one bill of costs payable by the plaintiff-appellant and the defendant-appellant.

The plaintiff alleged that she was injured when she tripped and fell on a passageway that led between two buildings from the street to a Village of Bronxville (hereinafter the Village) parking lot located behind the buildings. The Village moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to allege and prove that the Village had been given prior written notice of the alleged defect.

Pursuant to Village Law § 6-628, prior written notice is a condition precedent to maintaining an action against the Village arising from a sidewalk defect ( see, Tyschak v. Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 A.D.2d 670). Contrary to the plaintiff's argument, the passageway involved herein falls within the scope of the prior written notice provisions of the statute. This Court has previously "held that provisions similar to the one at bar cover any walkways over which the public has a general right of passage" ( Rivers v. City of New Rochelle, 178 A.D.2d 467; also see, Schneid v. City of White Plains, 150 A.D.2d 549; Kadlecik v Village of Endicott, 174 A.D.2d 923; Mendes v. Whitney-Floral Realty Corp., 216 A.D.2d 540). Since the plaintiff has failed to allege or show that the Village had received prior written notice of the alleged defect, the complaint was properly dismissed insofar as asserted against the Village ( see, Giganti v. Town of Hempstead, 186 A.D.2d 627; Mollahan v. Village of Port Washington N., 153 A.D.2d 881).

We have examined the appellants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE B. LAZZARI, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF BRONXVILLE, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 13

Citing Cases

Morzello v. Village of Briarcliff Manor

Upon submission by the parties of stipulated facts, the Supreme Court granted the defendant's application to…

Staudinger v. Village of Granville

trary, two of defendant's Department of Public Works employees, including its Superintendent of Public Works,…