From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laycox v. Page

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 6, 2022
3:21-CV-8-LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 6, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-CV-8-LPR

09-06-2022

DAMRON LAYCOX ADC #551582 PLAINTIFF v. JOE PAGE, III, Warden, Grimes Unit, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. (Doc. 31). No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After a careful and de novo review of the Recommendation and the record, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of exhaustion (Doc. 23) is GRANTED, and Mr. Laycox's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Laycox v. Page

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 6, 2022
3:21-CV-8-LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Laycox v. Page

Case Details

Full title:DAMRON LAYCOX ADC #551582 PLAINTIFF v. JOE PAGE, III, Warden, Grimes Unit…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

3:21-CV-8-LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 6, 2022)