From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawyer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 24, 2010
28 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Summary

holding that court would review defendant's unpreserved claim and reverse his conviction when codefendant, who was tried jointly with defendant, properly preserved and succeeded on same claim, and both defendants were similarly situated in that their defenses were "closely intertwined"

Summary of this case from State v. Rogers

Opinion

No. 4D08-173.

February 24, 2010.

Appeal from the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County, Paul L. Backman, J.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ephrat Livni, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Denise Lawyer appeals her conviction and life sentence for second-degree murder, a crime for which she was charged on a principal theory with her co-defendant James Williams. The two were tried together for an incident in which her co-defendant shot and killed the victim outside a club in Broward County.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on the second-degree murder charge based on Williams v. State, 982 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), in which we reversed the conviction of her co-defendant as a result of an erroneous self-defense instruction as well as the trial court's refusal to admit crucial evidence to his self-defense claim. Because Lawyer's defense in this case was so closely intertwined with her co-defendant's self-defense claim, we hold that the improper jury instruction and evidentiary rulings that entitled Williams to a new trial also require a new trial for Lawyer. If Williams were exonerated on a self-defense claim, then Lawyer would almost certainly be acquitted as well.

We affirm without further comment on the other issues in the case, except that on retrial, the trial court should not admit into evidence the post-arrest photograph of Lawyer, which depicted her in handcuffs in front of a sheriff's squad car at the scene of the incident. Lawyer's identity was not at issue and this photograph was not relevant to any material

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lawyer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 24, 2010
28 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

holding that court would review defendant's unpreserved claim and reverse his conviction when codefendant, who was tried jointly with defendant, properly preserved and succeeded on same claim, and both defendants were similarly situated in that their defenses were "closely intertwined"

Summary of this case from State v. Rogers
Case details for

Lawyer v. State

Case Details

Full title:Denise LAWYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 24, 2010

Citations

28 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

State v. Rogers

Our conclusion is consistent with holdings of courts in other jurisdictions, which, likewise, have held under…