From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawyer v. Homary Int'l Ltd.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 23, 2024
4:24-cv-04113-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-04113-HSG

07-23-2024

LAILA LAWYER, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HOMARY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Defendants.


Complaint Filed: April 02, 2024

Response Dated: July 30, 2024

New Response Dated: August 13, 2024

ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER RE PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO RULE 12 MOTION TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-2)

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Judge.

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the parties' Stipulation, the Declaration of Ping Zhang and finding good cause therefor, hereby ORDERS as follows:

Should Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the following briefing schedule will govern:

• Plaintiff's Opposition filed no later than: September 3, 2024

• Defendant's Reply filed no later than: September 17, 2024

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lawyer v. Homary Int'l Ltd.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 23, 2024
4:24-cv-04113-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Lawyer v. Homary Int'l Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:LAILA LAWYER, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 23, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-04113-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2024)