From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence Bros. v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2012
2012-3180 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2012)

Opinion

2012-3180

10-11-2012

LAWRENCE BROTHERS, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Intervenor.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF3151110724-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Army (Army) moves without opposition to reform the caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) as the respondent and the Army as intervenor.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board and Army's briefs are due within 21 days from the date of issuance of this order.

FOR THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s26


Summaries of

Lawrence Bros. v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2012
2012-3180 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Lawrence Bros. v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE BROTHERS, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 11, 2012

Citations

2012-3180 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2012)