From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LAWLER v. TROP WORLD CASINO AND ENTERTAINMENT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 14, 1997


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered February 5, 1996, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)(4) to stay the action.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the action is stayed.

The plaintiff, John E. Lawler, allegedly sustained injuries when a poolside chair at the defendant Trop World Casino and Entertainment Resort (hereinafter Trop World) in Atlantic City collapsed. He and his wife commenced an action in New Jersey (hereinafter the New Jersey action) against, inter alia, the defendants in the instant action, Trop World and Aztar Corporation. Service of the summons and complaint in the New Jersey action was made on August 22, 1995. The defendants answered the complaint in the New Jersey action, and asserted, as part of their answer, that they lacked knowledge or information sufficient to state a belief as to the ownership and/or management of Trop World, or of their own corporate status. In November 1995 the plaintiff served the defendants with a summons with notice in the instant action (hereinafter the New York action), and the defendants moved to stay the prosecution of the New York action. We reverse.

Where there is a prior action pending in another State and there is a question as to whether the parties can be afforded full relief therein, the preferred course is to stay the New York action pending a final determination of the prior action ( see, SafeCard Servs. v. American Express Travel Related Servs. Co., 203 A.D.2d 65; Flintkote Co. v. American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 501, affd 67 N.Y.2d 857, on opn at App. Div.). The record here demonstrates the existence of such a factual question and, consequently, the prosecution of the New York action must be stayed pending a final resolution of the prior New Jersey action. Bracken, J.P., Pizzuto, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LAWLER v. TROP WORLD CASINO AND ENTERTAINMENT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

LAWLER v. TROP WORLD CASINO AND ENTERTAINMENT

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. LAWLER, Respondent, v. TROP WORLD CASINO AND ENTERTAINMENT RESORT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 360

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Pena

While the Court finds that CPLR 3211(a)(4) applies to this action, it need not dismiss an action pursuant to…

PWE (Multi) QRS 14-85 Inc. v. J-M Mfg. Co.

This action is therefore stayed pending a final determination in the Utah action. (See Lawler v TropWorld…