From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jan 18, 2022
501 P.3d 990 (Nev. 2022)

Opinion

No. 84059

01-18-2022

Ronald Walter LAW, an Individual, in Pro Per, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Ronald Walter Law Dennett Winspear, LLP


Ronald Walter Law

Dennett Winspear, LLP

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the notice of appeal, docketing statement, and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The notice of appeal was prematurely filed in the district court after the filing of a timely tolling motion for reconsideration and before that tolling motion was resolved via a written order entered in the district court. See NRAP 4(a)(4) (regarding tolling motions); AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion carries tolling effect). To date, it appears the tolling motion remains pending in the district court. As this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a premature notice of appeal, see NRAP 4(a)(6) ("A premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction."), this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Law v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jan 18, 2022
501 P.3d 990 (Nev. 2022)
Case details for

Law v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Ronald Walter LAW, an Individual, in Pro Per, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

501 P.3d 990 (Nev. 2022)