Opinion
No. 84059
01-18-2022
Ronald Walter Law Dennett Winspear, LLP
Ronald Walter Law
Dennett Winspear, LLP
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Review of the notice of appeal, docketing statement, and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The notice of appeal was prematurely filed in the district court after the filing of a timely tolling motion for reconsideration and before that tolling motion was resolved via a written order entered in the district court. See NRAP 4(a)(4) (regarding tolling motions); AA Primo Builders LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion carries tolling effect). To date, it appears the tolling motion remains pending in the district court. As this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a premature notice of appeal, see NRAP 4(a)(6) ("A premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction."), this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.