From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law Sch. Admission Council, Inc. v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
NO. CIV. S-13-0040 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-13-0040 LKK/DAD

02-28-2013

LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; and TOM TORLAKSON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction and Director of Education for the State of California, Defendants.


ORDER

The court is in receipt of the Defendant State of California's filed bill of costs in the above-captioned matter, ECF No. 6, as well as Plaintiff Law School Admission Council, Inc.'s filed objections to the bill of costs, ECF No. 7.

Defendants seek $523.23 for the costs of filing, serving, and copying their notice of removal of this case from the Sacramento County Superior Court, as well as attendant costs for postage and mileage. See Defs' Bill of Costs, ECF No. 6.

According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, "[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs--other than attorney's fees--should be allowed to the prevailing party." Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1).

On January 9, 2013, Plaintiff Law School Admission Council, Inc., voluntarily dismissed this action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), before any answer or motion for summary judgment on the part of the Defendants' was filed or served. Pl's Not., ECF No. 5.

This type of voluntary dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), "leaves the parties as though no action had been brought." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Because, here, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, neither party has prevailed in the action. Defendants are, therefore, not entitled to the costs typically awarded to a prevailing party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54.

Defendants' bill of costs, ECF No. 6, is DENIED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Law Sch. Admission Council, Inc. v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
NO. CIV. S-13-0040 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Law Sch. Admission Council, Inc. v. California

Case Details

Full title:LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

NO. CIV. S-13-0040 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)