From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law Office of Conners v. Cohn

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 23, 2006
Civil Action 2:05-CV-462 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:05-CV-462.

February 23, 2006


ORDER


On January 19, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, or in the Alternative, Transfer to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Doc. No. 15, be denied without prejudice to refiling within thirty (30) days after defendants serve their responses to plaintiff's jurisdiction-related discovery requests. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, or in the alternative, transfer to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Doc. No. 15, is DENIED, without prejudice to refiling within thirty (30) days after defendants serve their responses to plaintiff's jurisdiction-related discovery requests.


Summaries of

Law Office of Conners v. Cohn

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 23, 2006
Civil Action 2:05-CV-462 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Law Office of Conners v. Cohn

Case Details

Full title:LAW OFFICE OF JAMES P. CONNERS, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS ALAN COHN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

Civil Action 2:05-CV-462 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2006)