Opinion
November 13, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.).
Plaintiff's allegations, given every favorable intendment, show that she was an independent contractor, not an employee (cf., Giaimo Vreeberg v. Smith, 192 A.D.2d 41, 45, appeal dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 803), and, because she did not "carry out work in furtherance of an employer's business enterprise" (Administrative Code § 8-102 [5]), the action was properly dismissed.
Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.