From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lauter v. Rosenblatt

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2022
2:15-CV-08481 DDP-KSx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:15-CV-08481 DDP-KSx

12-28-2022

BRETT LAUTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ROSENBLATT; ECHO BRIDGE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; PLATINUM DISC, LLC; ECHO BRIDGE HOME ENTERTAINMENT ECHO BRIDGE ACQUISITION CORP. LLC; BHC INTERIM FUNDING II, L.P.; BHC INTERIM FUNDING MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE; Defendants.


Hearing Dated: December 12, 2022

JUDGMENT

Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

Plaintiff Brett Lauter (hereinafter “Lauter”) filed and served upon Defendants Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC (hereinafter “EBE”); Platinum Disc, LLC (hereinafter “Platinum”); and Echo Bridge Home Entertainment (hereinafter “EBHE”) (EBE, Platinum and EBHE are hereinafter collectively referred to as “the EBE Entities") a summons and Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in the above-captioned action. Said Defendants failed to appear and answer or otherwise respond to the TAC. The Clerk of the Court entered the default of Defendants pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Lauter filed a Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Motion”) with supporting papers establishing damages under his various claims. The Motion having been considered and granted by the Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, and Lauter having presented further evidence, including sworn testimony, at a damages hearing, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Lauter and against Defendants Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC; Platinum Disc, LLC; and Echo Bridge Home Entertainment, on the First, Second, Third, and Sixth Causes of Action. Lauter is entitled to pre-judgment interest pursuant to California Civil Code Section 3289(b).

JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Lauter and against Defendants Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC; Platinum Disc, LLC; and Echo Bridge Home Entertainment, on the Fourth Cause of Action. Lauter having elected to pursue statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. section 504(c)(2), and the court finding that the infringement was willful, the court awards statutory damages in the amount of $40,000 per film.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED that the “Multi Picture Deal / Acquisition of Digital Rights” dated June 15, 2011 by and between Lauter and Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC is declared RESCINDED as of June 30, 2014. Defendants Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC; Platinum Disc, LLC; and Echo Bridge Home Entertainment, and their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, assigns, and attorneys, and those persons acting in concert with them, are permanently enjoined from using, copying, selling, distributing, publicly performing or displaying the Films. Defendants Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC; Platinum Disc, LLC; and Echo Bridge Home Entertainment, and their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, assigns, and attorneys, and those persons acting in concert with them, shall immediately deliver all masters and copies, including hard drives and electronic copies and masters, of the Films in said persons' possession, custody or control for destruction in a place and manner acceptable to Lauter.

Plaintiff Brett Lauter shall recover from Defendants Echo Bridge Entertainment, LLC; Platinum Disc, LLC; and Echo Bridge Home Entertainment, jointly and severally, the judgment as follows:

(a) Actual Damages of: $226,257.18;

(b) Pre-judgment Interest of: $161,417.45 up to December 12, 2022 and $61.99 per day accruing thereafter until the date of entry of judgment;

(c) Reasonable Audit Costs of: $55,800;

(d) Statutory Damages of: $400,000;

(e) Legal Costs and Expenses of: $10,342.95; and

(f) Post-judgment Interest on the total (total = a + b + c +d + e) at the rate of 4.64% compounded annually.

TOTAL JUDGMENT = $ 853,817.58


Summaries of

Lauter v. Rosenblatt

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2022
2:15-CV-08481 DDP-KSx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Lauter v. Rosenblatt

Case Details

Full title:BRETT LAUTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ROSENBLATT; ECHO BRIDGE ENTERTAINMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2022

Citations

2:15-CV-08481 DDP-KSx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2022)