From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurie v. Kraft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION
Jun 7, 2012
Case 2:11-0116 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case 2:11-0116

06-07-2012

ANNETTE LAURIE, Plaintiff v. JACQUELINE KRAFT, Defendant/ Counterclaimant


Judge Sharp/Brown

Jury Demand


ORDER

The Plaintiff in this matter has filed a motion for partial summary judgment (Docket Entry 22). This motion must be refiled in accordance with Local Rule 56.01. There should be a motion, a separate memorandum of law, and a separate and concise statement of facts as required by this Rule.

In addition, the motion has attached to it exhibits listed as Exhibits listed A through H. In accordance with the ECF instruction manual, attachments should have a descriptive topic supplied with them. For example, Attachment 1 should have a short description of what it actually is. If counsel has difficulties the ECF system, he should contact the help desk for guidance.

Once the motion is refiled the Plaintiff will have 21 days within which to respond.

It is so ORDERED.

JOE B. BROWN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Laurie v. Kraft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION
Jun 7, 2012
Case 2:11-0116 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Laurie v. Kraft

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE LAURIE, Plaintiff v. JACQUELINE KRAFT, Defendant/ Counterclaimant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

Case 2:11-0116 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2012)