From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lauridsen v. Alexander

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 20, 1926
16 F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 4744.

December 20, 1926.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Western District of Washington; Edward E. Cushman, Judge.

Action by Solomon Lauridsen and Henry Kamps against Louis H. Alexander and Jane Doe Alexander. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

F.C. Reagan and Edwin H. Flick, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellants.

Wesley Lloyd, of Tacoma, Wash., and George Dysart and C.D. Cunningham, both of Centralia, Wash., for appellees.

Before RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, and DIETRICH and KERRIGAN, District Judges.



In its legal aspect this case is identical with No. 4742, Katie Roberts Wilson v. Margaret Jane Robinson et al., 16 F.2d 431, this day decided, and for the reasons assigned in that case the decree is affirmed, as there modified.

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, dissents, for the reason stated in Wilson v. Robinson, supra.


Summaries of

Lauridsen v. Alexander

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 20, 1926
16 F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Lauridsen v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:LAURIDSEN et al. v. ALEXANDER et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1926

Citations

16 F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1926)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Robinson

The petition will be denied. A similar order will be entered in each of the companion cases of Wilson v.…