From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laura Accessories, Inc. v. A.P.A. Warehouses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1988
140 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 10, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shorter, J.).


APA's insurance company assigned counsel to represent APA in this action by a lessee of APA's warehouse for damages from losses due to burglary at the warehouse. Counsel moved to withdraw on the grounds that APA violated the terms of the insurance policy by failing to notify the insurance company of the claim as soon as practicable.

The right to deny coverage is not properly tested by a motion of counsel to withdraw. The issue can only be resolved by a declaratory judgment action in which the defendant would be able to adequately litigate the facts of its disclaimer. The IAS court's decision, in effect, validated the disclaimer without the opportunity of the insured to be heard. (Brothers v Burt, 27 N.Y.2d 905; Monaghan v Meade, 91 A.D.2d 1014, 1015; Presley v Williams, 57 A.D.2d 947.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

Laura Accessories, Inc. v. A.P.A. Warehouses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1988
140 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Laura Accessories, Inc. v. A.P.A. Warehouses

Case Details

Full title:LAURA ACCESSORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. A.P.A. WAREHOUSES, INC., Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 10, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sojka v. 43 Wooster LLC

quently moved to be relieved as counsel on the grounds that withdrawal is permitted if the client refuses to…

Pryer v. DeMatteis Organizations, Inc.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied, without prejudice to…