From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lauharn v. Warden, Toledo Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
May 30, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-116 (S.D. Ohio May. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-116

05-30-2014

GARY LAUHARN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Toledo Correctional Institution, Respondent.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, despite an extension of time, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is also DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous.

__________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lauharn v. Warden, Toledo Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
May 30, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-116 (S.D. Ohio May. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Lauharn v. Warden, Toledo Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:GARY LAUHARN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Toledo Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: May 30, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-116 (S.D. Ohio May. 30, 2014)