From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latuca v. Latuca

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 20, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 94773 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

12-20-2016

Donna M. LATUCA, Appellant, v. John M. LATUCA, Respondent.


Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court takes this occasion to restate the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v. Mead–Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297–298, 169 N.E. 386 [1929] ).


Summaries of

Latuca v. Latuca

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 20, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 94773 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

Latuca v. Latuca

Case Details

Full title:Donna M. LATUCA, Appellant, v. John M. LATUCA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 20, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 94773 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 94773
28 N.Y.3d 1099
45 N.Y.S.3d 360

Citing Cases

Harris v. Schreibman

As discussed supra, both parties substantially reduced their income to be able to spend more time with their…

Flom v. Flom

Here, the court's determination that defendant could earn $ 50,000 finds no credible support in the record.…