From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latta v. N.Y. State Doc

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2021
21-CV-7631 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-7631 (LTS)

10-28-2021

RYDELL LATTA, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE DOC, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated September 14, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) and prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Latta v. N.Y. State Doc

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2021
21-CV-7631 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Latta v. N.Y. State Doc

Case Details

Full title:RYDELL LATTA, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE DOC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 28, 2021

Citations

21-CV-7631 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2021)