From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latorraca v. Latorraca

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 30, 1943
31 A.2d 819 (N.J. 1943)

Opinion

Argued February 8th, 1943.

Decided April 30th, 1943.

On appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Milton M. Unger, for the complainant-appellant.

Messrs. Lum, Fairlie Wachenfeld ( Mr. Ralph E. Lum and Mr. Joseph J. Biunno), for the respondent Joseph Latorraca.

Mr. Nathan A. Whitfield, guardian, pro se.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow and reported at 132 N.J. Eq. 40. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Latorraca v. Latorraca

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 30, 1943
31 A.2d 819 (N.J. 1943)
Case details for

Latorraca v. Latorraca

Case Details

Full title:OPHELIA LATORRACA, complainant-appellant, v. NICOLA LATORRACA et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 30, 1943

Citations

31 A.2d 819 (N.J. 1943)
31 A.2d 819

Citing Cases

The National State Bank of Newark v. Nadeau

The opinion recognizes, however, that "executors who carry on a business of the testator are entitled to…

In re Koretzky

2 Scott on Trusts, sec. 193.2, pp. 1049, 1050. See Latorraca v. Latorraca, 132 N.J. Eq. 40 ( Ch. 1942)…