From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latiuk v. Cona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 10, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Lunn, J. — Negligence.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Before: Green, J.P., Hayes, Wisner and Hurlbutt, JJ.


Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's proof on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). Plaintiff's treating psychiatrist testified to the objective medical findings of another physician, but he did not testify that those findings were related to the motor vehicle accident approximately two years before those findings were made ( see, Lichtman-Williams v. Desmond, 202 A.D.2d 646, lv dismissed 84 N.Y.2d 849). The two physicians who testified that plaintiff's soft tissue injuries were caused by the motor vehicle accident found no objective evidence to support plaintiff's subjective complaints of pain ( see, Scheer v. Koubek, 70 N.Y.2d 678, 679; Crandall v. Sledziewski, 260 A.D.2d 754, 757, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 811; Green v. Gloede Assocs. Leasing, 222 A.D.2d 1066, 1067; Eldred v. Stoddard, 217 A.D.2d 952, 953).

Any error in refusing to admit certain medical reports in evidence is harmless because plaintiff's psychiatrist testified concerning the contents of those reports.


Summaries of

Latiuk v. Cona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Latiuk v. Cona

Case Details

Full title:KATHY LATIUK, APPELLANT, v. KAREN A. CONA, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 531

Citing Cases

Hicklin v. LaDuca

Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motions for a directed verdict at the close of proof on the ground…

Cheek v. State

In order to satisfy the statutory serious injury threshold a plaintiff must present objective proof of a…