From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lathon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 27, 2003
105 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81759

May 27, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable James R. Hartenbach.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


Appellant Paul Lathon ("Lathon") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to locate, interview and call three witnesses at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous pursuant to Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J. concurring.


Summaries of

Lathon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 27, 2003
105 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Lathon v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL LATHON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 27, 2003

Citations

105 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Lathon v. Dwyer

(Id. at 91.) His appeal was denied on May 27, 2003. Lathon v. State, 105 S.W.3d 879, 880 (Mo.Ct.App. 2003)…