Opinion
Civil Action 1:23-cv-1486
03-05-2024
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Plaintiff, v. LW-IUF.COM, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
CLAUDE M. HILTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dated February 13, 2024, in response to a Motion for Default Judgment.
Based on a de novo review of the evidence in this case, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and having received no objections thereto, it appears to the Court that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly, this Court affirms the findings of the Magistrate Judge. It is hereby
ORDERED that default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against the Defendant Domain Names with respect to Plaintiffs claim alleging a violation of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). It is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(2)(D)(i), VeriSign Global Registry Services, as the registry for the Defendant Domain Names, must transfer the registrars of record for the Defendant Domain Names to Plaintiffs registrar of choice, Safenames Ltd., and that Safenames Ltd. must take all necessary steps to have Plaintiff listed as the registrant for the Defendant Domain Names.