From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasson v. Brannon Associates Attorneys at Law

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 15, 2008
Case No. 3:07cv0271 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv0271.

February 15, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. # 12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on January 30, 2008 (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. #5, 11) due to insufficient service are GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Extend/Enlarge Service Time (Doc. #10) is DENIED;
4. Defendants Amended Motion for Sanctions (Doc. # 6) is GRANTED;
5. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
6. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Lasson v. Brannon Associates Attorneys at Law

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 15, 2008
Case No. 3:07cv0271 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Lasson v. Brannon Associates Attorneys at Law

Case Details

Full title:GERALD A. LASSON, Plaintiff, v. BRANNON ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW, et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Feb 15, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv0271 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2008)

Citing Cases

Grove v. Mohr

Accordingly, "'shotgun pleadings' are generally disfavored by courts." Id. (citing Lasson v. Brannon &…

Bostic v. Davis

These types of "shotgun pleadings" are generally disfavored by courts. See, e.g., Lasson v. Brannon &…