From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lassiter v. Lassiter

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 19, 1987
352 S.E.2d 486 (S.C. 1987)

Summary

affirming denial of alimony to wife when it was wife's third marriage and both parties worked

Summary of this case from Myers v. Myers

Opinion

22658

Submitted December 8, 1986.

Decided January 19, 1987.

Joseph W. Ginn, III, of Thomas Ginn, Charleston, for petitioner. C. Dixon Lee, III, Columbia, for respondent.


Submitted Dec. 8, 1986.

Decided Jan. 19, 1987.


Petitioner (Husband) seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Lassiter v. Lassiter, 289 S.C. 341, 345 S.E.2d 504 (Ct.App. 1986). We grant the writ as to Question IV, dispense with further briefing, and reverse.

Husband and Wife were divorced on November 8, 1983. While the appeal from the divorce decree was pending, the family court held Husband in contempt for taking possession of the Chevrolet awarded to Wife. The Court of Appeals found that the contempt order was proper because Husband had not filed an appeal bond staying the delivery of personal property under S.C. Code Ann. § 18-9-150 (1985). This was error.

In Chris v. Chris, 287 S.C. 161, 337 S.E.2d 209 (1985), we held that an appeal automatically stays the enforcement of an equitable division award. Therefore, the lower court had no jurisdiction to enforce the award by contempt while the case was on appeal.

For this reason, we reverse the portion of the Court of Appeals' opinion affirming the contempt order. The remaining portions of the opinion of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.


Summaries of

Lassiter v. Lassiter

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 19, 1987
352 S.E.2d 486 (S.C. 1987)

affirming denial of alimony to wife when it was wife's third marriage and both parties worked

Summary of this case from Myers v. Myers
Case details for

Lassiter v. Lassiter

Case Details

Full title:Marilyn K. LASSITER, Respondent v. Ronald L. LASSITER, Petitioner

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 19, 1987

Citations

352 S.E.2d 486 (S.C. 1987)
352 S.E.2d 486

Citing Cases

Myers v. Myers

We find precedent is in accord with our decision. See, e.g., Hatfield v. Hatfield, 327 S.C. 360, 364-65, 489…

Luthi v. Luthi

On June 30, 1987, Judge Albert L. Kleckley issued his order concluding, as a matter of law, Judge McEachin's…