Summary
In Las Palmas Food Co. v. Ramirez Feraud Chili Co., 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957) (per curiam), affg and adopting by reference Ramirez Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., 146 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.Cal. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 927, 78 S.Ct. 384, 2 L.Ed.2d 357 (1958), our circuit took up a question Bulova left open. Like Bulova, Las Palmas was a Lanham Act suit for injunctive relief against the infringement of a plaintiffs trademark and trade name in Mexico.
Summary of this case from United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.Opinion
No. 15306.
July 29, 1957.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William C. Mathes, Judge.
Mason Howard, C. Loy Mason and Paul P. Selvin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Harris, Kiech, Foster Harris, Warren L. Kern and Walton Eugene Tinsley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before LEMMON, CHAMBERS, and BARNES, Circuit Judges.
All of the points relied upon for reversal on this appeal were ably considered and disposed of by the trial judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 146 F. Supp. 594. We adopt it as our own. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is
Affirmed.