Opinion
No. 20110770–CA.
2012-01-6
James H. LARSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Randall WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.
James H. Larsen, Provo, Appellant Pro Se. Peter C. Schofield, Orem, for Appellee.
James H. Larsen, Provo, Appellant Pro Se. Peter C. Schofield, Orem, for Appellee.
Before Judges McHUGH, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.
DECISION
PER CURIAM:
¶ 1 James H. Larsen appeals the trial court's order dismissing his complaint. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. Larsen failed to respond to the motion. As a result of his failure to respond and the lack of a viable legal issue identified in his docketing statement, he has failed to identify a substantial question for review warranting further consideration by this court. See Utah R.App. P. 10. Absent a substantial issue for review, this court may summarily affirm a district court's order.
¶ 2 Affirmed.