From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larsen v. Drive Financial Services

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Dec 7, 2010
Case No. 2:08-CV-933-DB (D. Utah Dec. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-CV-933-DB.

December 7, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Samuel Alba on November 15, 2010, recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

On September 14, 2010, the court entered an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiff to respond within 30 days explaining why his Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The court informed Plaintiff that failure to respond would result in dismissal of this case. (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause. Moreover, the parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it, and neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant filed a timely objection. (Doc. 20).

Objections to a magistrate judge's findings or recommendations are reviewed de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636. After carefully evaluating all relevant materials, including the parties' briefs, and the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES Plaintiff's case for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 6th day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Larsen v. Drive Financial Services

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Dec 7, 2010
Case No. 2:08-CV-933-DB (D. Utah Dec. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Larsen v. Drive Financial Services

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY B. LARSEN, Plaintiff, v. DRIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:08-CV-933-DB (D. Utah Dec. 7, 2010)