From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 24, 2017
211 So. 3d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D15–3247

02-24-2017

Charleston Kareem LARRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. Immediately prior to sentencing, the trial court speculated about Appellant's past behavior for which there was no record basis. Moreover, the subject matter of the past behavior was not relevant to the sentence. Under these circumstances, the sentence must be reversed and remanded for re-sentencing before a different judge.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Larry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 24, 2017
211 So. 3d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Larry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charleston Kareem LARRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Feb 24, 2017

Citations

211 So. 3d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)