From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larry v. Nisley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 30, 2012
3:09-CV-663-AC (D. Or. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

3:09-CV-663-AC

07-30-2012

ROBERT J. LARRY, Plaintiff, v. ERIC NISLEY, in his individual capacity, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#175) on July 11, 2012, in which he recommends the Court deny Defendant Eric Nisley's Motion (#169) to Remand. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#175) and, accordingly, DENIES Defendant Nisley's Motion (#169) to Remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Larry v. Nisley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 30, 2012
3:09-CV-663-AC (D. Or. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Larry v. Nisley

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. LARRY, Plaintiff, v. ERIC NISLEY, in his individual capacity, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

3:09-CV-663-AC (D. Or. Jul. 30, 2012)