From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaRose v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 8, 2024
3:24-cv-02039-WHO (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-02039-WHO

04-08-2024

PSHATOIA LAROSE, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING IFP AND SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT

RE: DKT. NO. 2

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Pshatoia Larose removed this case from the Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County, where Larose filed the case against defendant Apple, Inc., in September 2023. [Dkt. No. 1] at pdf 5. On February 6, 2024, the state court sustained Apple's demurrer to Larose's amended complaint and gave Larose ten days to file an amended complaint. Id. at pdf 129. When Larose failed to file an amended complaint, Apple filed a motion to dismiss and demurrer with a hearing set for April 11, 2024. Id. at pdf 135. Rather than respond to that pending motion, on April 1 Larose filed a notice of removal of her own case to federal court. [Dkt. No. 1].

Larose does not explain why she can remove the case that she filed in state court, or why the 30-day deadline for removal would not apply. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446. Because the case was improperly removed from state court, I sua sponte REMAND the case to the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara County, where the court may address the defendant's pending motion.

Larose's application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Dkt. No. 2], is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LaRose v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 8, 2024
3:24-cv-02039-WHO (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2024)
Case details for

LaRose v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PSHATOIA LAROSE, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 8, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-02039-WHO (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2024)