From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larkin v. Cabraser

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 26, 2024
No. 24-CV-00190-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-00190-HSG

02-26-2024

BILLY F. LARKIN, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH J. CABRASER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On or about January 10, 2024, Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint with the Court. Dkt. No. 1. That same day, the Court sent Plaintiff a notice that the action was deficient because he had not paid the filing fee or filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. The Court informed Plaintiff that he should correct this deficiency by February 7, 2024, or the action would be dismissed. Id. The Court sent Plaintiff a blank in forma pauperis application form. Id. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis application, or paid the filing fee, or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to either pay the filing fee or file a complete in forma pauperis application. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must be accompanied by either the filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff, terminate all pending motions as moot, and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Larkin v. Cabraser

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 26, 2024
No. 24-CV-00190-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Larkin v. Cabraser

Case Details

Full title:BILLY F. LARKIN, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH J. CABRASER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 26, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-00190-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)