From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Largotta v. Recife Realty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1998
254 A.D.2d 225 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.).


Issues of fact exist, including whether plaintiff's injuries were caused by his alleged fall from an unsteady ladder or whether they resulted from his repetitive use of a shotgun nailing machine. We need not reach the question whether various reports, unsworn but arguably containing admissions against plaintiff's interest, constituted evidence in admissible form ( cf., Ferrara v. Poranski, 88 A.D.2d 904; Schanberg v. State of New York, 30 A.D.2d 712), because "evidence, otherwise excludable at trial, may be considered to deny a motion for summary judgment provided that this evidence does not form the sole basis for the court's determination" ( Wertheimer v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 85 A.D.2d 540, 541).

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Largotta v. Recife Realty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1998
254 A.D.2d 225 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Largotta v. Recife Realty Company

Case Details

Full title:DON LARGOTTA et al., Appellants, v. RECIFE REALTY COMPANY, N. V., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 225 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 141

Citing Cases

Clemmer v. Drah Cab Corp.

However, the report was unsworn and therefore inadmissible ( see Petinrin v Levering, 17 AD3d 173). Also…

Rivera v. Super Star Leasing

He opined that plaintiff's symptoms were caused by the accident, and concluded that plaintiff had sustained…