From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Largaespado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 16, 1995
658 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-321.

August 16, 1995.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Maynard A. Gross and Amy Steele Donner, Judges.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Doquyen T. Nguyen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


Upon the State's proper confession of error, and because no evidence of the burglary was presented at the probation violation hearing, this cause is remanded to the trial court to enter a written order of Revocation of Probation in case # 94-671, strike the finding of violation as to condition 6 (the burglary charge) and make such redetermination as may warranted, because the record is unclear as to whether the trial court would have revoked Defendant's probation and given him the same sentence absent the violation of condition 6.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Largaespado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 16, 1995
658 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Largaespado v. State

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL LARGAESPADO, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 16, 1995

Citations

658 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Scarlet v. State

In sum, we reverse and remand for further proceedings, as it is not clear from the record that on the two…

Cheatham v. State

Although one ground for revocation was proper, "the record is unclear as to whether the trial court would…