From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lapsley v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 16, 2012
Civil No. 11-20 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Jul. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-20 (RHK/JSM)

07-16-2012

Kenneth L. Lapsley, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.


ORDER

The above-entitled matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated June 6, 2012, together with Petitioner's Objections thereto. Based on the undersigned's de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, the Objections thereto, the submissions of the parties, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Objections (Doc. No. 23) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) is ADOPTED;
3. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Petitioner Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2255 (e) under the saving clause (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;
4. Petitioner's Motion for Discovery to Request Production of Documents (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED; and
5. Petitioner's Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

______________________

RICHARD H. KYLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lapsley v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 16, 2012
Civil No. 11-20 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Jul. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Lapsley v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth L. Lapsley, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 16, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-20 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Jul. 16, 2012)