From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lapinsky v. Wojciechowski

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 23, 2010
Civ. No. 10-4088 (PAM/MJX) (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-4088 (PAM/MJX).

December 23, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of then-Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated December 1, 2010. The R R recommended that the Court deny the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in its entirety and dismiss this action with prejudice. Petitioner has not filed objections to the R R in the time period permitted, and indeed has failed to respond to Court orders since at least October.

Since the issuance of the R R, Judge Nelson has been elevated to the position of United Stated District Judge.

Having failed to file objections, Petitioner has waived those objections. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 10) is ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) is DENIED;
3. The Application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is DENIED;
4. The Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 3) is DENIED;
5. The Motion for Release from Custody (Docket No. 5) is DENIED; and
6. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: Wednesday, December 22, 2010


Summaries of

Lapinsky v. Wojciechowski

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 23, 2010
Civ. No. 10-4088 (PAM/MJX) (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Lapinsky v. Wojciechowski

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence J. Lapinsky, Petitioner, v. Robyn Wojciechowski, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Dec 23, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 10-4088 (PAM/MJX) (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2010)