From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanza v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2020
19 CIVIL 6783 (AT)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 6783 (AT)(RWL)

09-18-2020

Richard F. Lanza, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 18, 2020, having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Robert W. Lehrburger, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED to the administrative law judge pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the R&R; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

September 18, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/_________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Lanza v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2020
19 CIVIL 6783 (AT)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Lanza v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Richard F. Lanza, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 18, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 6783 (AT)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2020)