From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lantz v. Z.H.B., S. Middleton T

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 26, 1983
76 Pa. Commw. 563 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

Opinion

Argued May 11, 1983

August 26, 1983.

Argued May 11, 1983, before President Judge CRUMLISH, JR. and Judges WILLIAMS, JR. and BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 652 C.D. 1982, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County in the case of Delano M. Lantz, Bruce G. Harris, D.D.S. v. The Zoning Hearing Board of South Middleton Township, George R. Bear and Jeanne Bear, No. 740 Civil 1981.

Conditional use permit revoked by the Board of Supervisors of South Middleton Township. Permit applicant appealed to the Zoning Hearing Board of South Middleton Township. Appeal sustained. Protestants appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. Motion to quash filed. Motion granted. HOFFER, J. Protestants appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.

C. Grainger Bowman, McNees, Wallace Nurrick, for appellants.

Thomas H. Bietsch, Bietsch Morgenthal, for appellees.


Delano M. Lantz and Bruce M. Harris appeal a Cumberland County Common Pleas Court order dismissing their appeal of the South Middleton Township Zoning Hearing Board's decision that George and Jeanne Bear had acquired vested rights to a conditional use and building permit. We affirm.

The issue here is whether Lantz or Harris has standing to appeal the board's decision. We hold that neither of them does. Lantz clearly lacks standing because he does not own property in South Middleton Township. See Cablevision v. Zoning Hearing Board of Easton, 13 Pa. Commw. 232, 320 A.2d 388 (1974). Harris owns property extending into the township, but the common pleas court determined that he did not have the immediate and pecuniary interest in the matter that is required for standing to appeal a zoning board decision. See Snyder v. Railroad Borough, 59 Pa. Commw. 385, 430 A.2d 339 (1980). He has not directed us to, and our review has not revealed, sufficient record evidence to indicate that the common pleas court erred.

Our review has unearthed only Harris' vague testimony before the board that his property value would in some way be damaged by the Bears' conditional use, a mobile home located one-quarter mile from his property line.

Affirmed.

ORDER

The Cumberland County Common Pleas Court order in 740 Civil Docket 1981, dated February 26, 1982, is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Lantz v. Z.H.B., S. Middleton T

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 26, 1983
76 Pa. Commw. 563 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
Case details for

Lantz v. Z.H.B., S. Middleton T

Case Details

Full title:Delano M. Lantz and Bruce G. Harris, D.D.S., Appellants v. The Zoning…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 26, 1983

Citations

76 Pa. Commw. 563 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
464 A.2d 672

Citing Cases

Miller et al. v. U. Allen T. Z.H.B et al

So saying, Judge HESS's opinion proceeded to quote the Cablevision dictum first quoted above. This court's…