From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lantz v. Peters

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 24, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1674 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-24-2017

In the Matter of William LANTZ, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Cynthia PETERS, Respondent–Appellant.

David J. Pajak, Alden, for respondent-appellant. Keliann M. Argy, Orchard Park, for petitioner-respondent. Emily A. Vella, Attorney for the Child, Springville.


David J. Pajak, Alden, for respondent-appellant.

Keliann M. Argy, Orchard Park, for petitioner-respondent.

Emily A. Vella, Attorney for the Child, Springville.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Family Court.

WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, and NEMOYER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lantz v. Peters

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 24, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1674 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Lantz v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William LANTZ, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Cynthia PETERS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1674 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
148 A.D.3d 1674