From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lansing v. Schenectady Railway Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1902
77 App. Div. 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

December Term, 1902.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied, with ten dollars costs. — Injunction modified by striking out that part thereof which reads as follows: "And that they be further enjoined and restrained, until the further order of the court, from interfering with the restoration of the street by the plaintiff herein and from in any way using the pole which it has put up on the premises," upon opinion in Paige v. Schenectady Railway Company ( ante, p. 571. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting.


Summaries of

Lansing v. Schenectady Railway Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1902
77 App. Div. 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Lansing v. Schenectady Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:Caroline Paige Lansing, Appellant, v. Schenectady Railway Company…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1902

Citations

77 App. Div. 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)