From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanners v. Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 2, 2020
Civil No. 19-2578 (JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 2, 2020)

Opinion

Civil No. 19-2578 (JRT/HB)

07-02-2020

CASSANDRA K. LANNERS and WESTON LANNERS, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA; KAYSIE BERGUM; LINDSAY GUTHRIE; MELINDA DOMS; KATHLEEN D. SHEEHY; SARA CROTTEAU; FINTAN MOORE; HELEN MARTIN; JESSE WINSELL; MAI T. VANG; ASHLEY SNEIDER; HENNEPIN COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION; HENNEPIN COUNTY; KYANNA FORD; WINDY ROSS; NICOLE MILLER; GUARDIAN AD-LITEM; MINNESOTA SOCIAL WORKER BOARD; RACHELLE STRATTON; RACHELLE LOEWENSON-STRATTON; JESSICA BRADSHAW; IN THE MATTER AND WELFARE OF: CASSANDRA KIMBERLY LANNERS, MAGGIE SKELTON; LIZ SCUDDER; JODY KEEZER; RAMSEY COUNTY PROTECTION; CATHERINE MCENROE; KIM MAMMEDATY; MY SEE YANG; RHONDA MILLER; SARAH LINDAHL-PFIEFFER; CHRISTA BENTSON; ELAINE SULLIVAN; and JODI WENTLAND Defendants/Respondents.

Cassandra K Lanners and Weston Lanners, 2136 Ford Parkway, Suite 5015, Saint Paul, MN 55116, pro se plaintiffs.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS AND MANDAMUS

Cassandra K Lanners and Weston Lanners, 2136 Ford Parkway, Suite 5015, Saint Paul, MN 55116, pro se plaintiffs.

Plaintiff Cassandra K. Lanners, after seeking repeatedly to litigate a Minnesota state court juvenile proceeding in federal court, now brings Petitions for a Writ of Mandamus and a for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (April 30, 2020, Docket Nos. 23-24.) Because these Petitions are without merit and are merely additional attempts to litigate this case in federal court, the Court will deny the Petitions. The Court will also repeat its order that Lanners may not make any additional filings in this matter.

Lanners initially attempted to remove Minnesota state juvenile case No. 27-JV-19-1016 to federal court in July 2019, and the Court remanded the action in August 2019, finding that removal was improper. (Mem. & Order at 3-4, Lanners v. Minnesota, Civil No. 19-2000, Aug. 14, 2019, Docket No. 6.) A month later, Lanners filed another notice of removal and the Court remanded the action three days later, again finding the removal improper. (Mem. & Order at 5-6, Lanners v. Minnesota, Civil No. 19-2578, Sept. 26, 2019, Docket No. 4.) The next day, Lanners filed an Amended Complaint, which the Court dismissed as moot. (Am. Compl., Sept 27, 2019, Docket No. 11.) In May 2020, Lanners removed the action yet again; the Court again remanded it and additionally gave Lanners 14 days to show cause why she should not be restricted from filing any new actions related to removing the state juvenile action. (Order to Show Cause, Lanners v. Minnesota, Civil No. 20-1206, June 3, 2020, Docket No. 8.) The Court entered an order placing Lanners on a list of restricted filers on June 18, 2020, barring her from continuing to litigate issues relating to the state juvenile case without first receiving prior permission from the Court. (Order, June 18, 2020, Docket No. 32.)

Shortly before Lanner's latest attempted removal and the resulting Order to Show Cause, Lanners filed two Petitions seeking a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Civil No. 19-2578, April 30, 2020, Docket Nos. 23-24.) Construed generously, these filings appear to be another attempt by Lanners to litigate the state juvenile proceeding in federal court. As noted in prior orders, the Court has no jurisdiction over that matter. Lanners does not appear to be in custody and so no writ of habeas corpus may issue. Nor has Lanners stated any basis for a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the Court will deny Lanner's Petitions. Lanners may not make any further filings related to the state juvenile proceeding without prior permission of the Court.

Furthermore, the Court will certify that Lanner's appeal is not taken in good faith, and will deny the her second IFP Application.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Lanners's Petitions for a Writ of Mandamus [Docket No. 23] and for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docket No. 24] are DENIED.

2. Lanner's second Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal [Docket No. 31] is DENIED.
Dated: July 2, 2020
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Lanners v. Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 2, 2020
Civil No. 19-2578 (JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Lanners v. Minnesota

Case Details

Full title:CASSANDRA K. LANNERS and WESTON LANNERS, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. STATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 2, 2020

Citations

Civil No. 19-2578 (JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 2, 2020)