From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanier v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2013
1: 09-cv-01779-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)

Opinion

1: 09-cv-01779-AWI-BAM

04-05-2013

JAMES M. LANIER, Plaintiff, v. FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND

ANSWER; MODIFYING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On March 13, 2013, Defendant filed a motion to amend its answer, setting the motion to be heard on April 12, 2013. (Doc. 83.) On April 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for a ten-day extension of time to file his opposition. (Doc. 88.) Plaintiff states his wife recently has undergone full knee replacement surgery, and Plaintiff is solely responsible for her in-home aftercare. Id.

Having reviewed Plaintiff's motion, and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS the following:

1. The hearing on Defendant's motion to amend its answer, currently set for April 12, 2013, is CONTINUED to May 3, 2013, at 9:30 AM, in Courtroom 8, before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe;
2. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before April 19, 2013;
3. Defendant shall file its reply on or before April 26, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lanier v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2013
1: 09-cv-01779-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Lanier v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. LANIER, Plaintiff, v. FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2013

Citations

1: 09-cv-01779-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)