From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanier v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
1: 11-cv-01522-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

1: 11-cv-01522-LJO-BAM

02-01-2013

JAMES M. LANIER, Plaintiff, v. FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the initial scheduling conference currently set for February 7, 2013. (Doc. 36.) Plaintiff represents he has been suffering from medical problems and recently underwent a heart-related procedure requiring hospitalization. Id.

Having reviewed Plaintiff's Motion to continue the scheduling conference, and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion. The scheduling conference currently set for February 7, 2013, is CONTINUED to March 26, 2013, at 9:00 AM, in Courtroom 8, before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.

In addition to Plaintiff's medical problems, the Court notes a motion to dismiss has recently been taken under submission by the District Judge. (Doc. 32.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lanier v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
1: 11-cv-01522-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Lanier v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. LANIER, Plaintiff, v. FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

1: 11-cv-01522-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)