From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langston v. United States Attorney General

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 6, 1961
293 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 13500.

Submitted May 22, 1961.

Decided July 6, 1961.

Daniel E. Langston, pro se.

Hubert I. Teitelbaum, U.S. Atty., and John F. Potter and Thomas J. Shannon, Asst. U.S. Attys., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


The plaintiff-appellant, who is incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, seeks to enforce an alleged oral contract between himself and the United States. It is clear that venue was improperly laid in the court below. See Sections 1346(a)(2) and 1402(a)(1), Title 28 U.S.C. It is also apparent that there has been no service on the parties named as defendants. See Rules 4(d) and 5, Fed.R.Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C. We need add only that the Declaratory Judgments Act, Section 2201, Title 28 U.S.C. on which the plaintiff-appellant relies in part, creates a remedy but it does not establish jurisdiction.

The order of the court below, dismissing the complaint for want of jurisdiction, will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Langston v. United States Attorney General

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 6, 1961
293 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Langston v. United States Attorney General

Case Details

Full title:Daniel E. LANGSTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, The…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 6, 1961

Citations

293 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

United States v. Langston

Rosheisen v. Steele, 193 F.2d 273 (8th Cir. 1951); Garcia v. Steele, 193 F.2d 276 (8th Cir. 1951). Defendant…

Steinagel v. Jacobson

Plaintiff resides in Florida. It is axiomatic that a specific venue statute controls over general venue…