From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langley v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Feb 22, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-71-DBH (D. Me. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:11-CV-71-DBH

02-22-2012

BART LANGLEY, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On February 3, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, her Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on February 21, 2012, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED and judgment is entered in favor of the Commissioner.

S O O RDERED.

____________

D. BROCK HORNBY

U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT J UDGE


Summaries of

Langley v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Feb 22, 2012
Civil No. 1:11-CV-71-DBH (D. Me. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Langley v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BART LANGLEY, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:11-CV-71-DBH (D. Me. Feb. 22, 2012)

Citing Cases

Julie B. v. Soc. Sec. Admin. Comm'r

Even if one accepts the argument, the two remaining jobs satisfy Defendant's burden at step 5. "The…