From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langenfeld v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 5, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cv-469 (S.D. Ohio May. 5, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-469

05-05-2014

KAREN LANGENFELD, Plaintiff, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.


JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's motion for a fourteen-day extension of time in which to respond to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 47.) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the request for an extension, but DENIES Plaintiff's request to extend the deadline until May 27, 2014. Plaintiff's response in opposition to Defendant's pending motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before May 19, 2014. The non-oral hearing on Defendant's pending motion remains scheduled for June 13, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Langenfeld v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 5, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cv-469 (S.D. Ohio May. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Langenfeld v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN LANGENFELD, Plaintiff, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 5, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-469 (S.D. Ohio May. 5, 2014)