From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langel v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 17, 1993
614 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-0700.

March 17, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Rupert J. Smith, Judge.

Barbara W. Bronis and Joseph L. Mannikko, of Frasier Mannikko, Stuart, for appellants.

Louisa Smith-Adam, of Colin Smith-Adam, Lake Worth, for appellee Searcy Denney, Scarola, Barnhart Shipley, P.A.

C.R. McDonald, Jr., Fort Pierce, for appellee C.R. McDonald, Jr.


We summarily affirm pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In so doing, we find that appellants have failed to raise any justiciable issue in this appeal. Appellants impermissibly seek to reargue issues they had raised and argued, and which were rejected, in a previous appeal. Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. Langel, 587 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We therefore award attorneys' fees as costs to appellees pursuant to 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1991). On remand, the trial court shall determine a reasonable fee for having to respond to this appeal.

AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO AWARD FEES.

HERSEY, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Langel v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 17, 1993
614 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Langel v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LANGEL AND JOAN LANGEL, APPELLANTS, v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 17, 1993

Citations

614 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Kurzman v. Unemployment Appeals

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Leblanc v. State Farm, 616 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Langel v.…