From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Ward

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2013
521 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6436

05-29-2013

CHRISTOPHER LANE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT WARD, Active Director; DENNIS PATTERSON, Division Director of Op; WAYNE MCCABE, Warden; JAMES BLACKWELL, DHO; THIERRY NETTLES, Major; LESLIE DAVIS, Lieutenant; FRED THOMPSON, Asst. Warden; TIMOTHY CLARKE, SMU Captain; ANNE SHEPHARD, Shift Captain, Defendants - Appellees.

Christopher Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (0:11-cv-02829-RBH) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lane appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lane v. Ward, No. 0:11-cv-02829-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Lane v. Ward

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2013
521 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Lane v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LANE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT WARD, Active Director…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2013)