From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 12, 2016
182 So. 3d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–4894.

01-12-2016

Fredrick LANE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Fredrick Lane, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Fredrick Lane, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking one ground of the motion with leave to amend, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action, mandamus relief was not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

THOMAS, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lane v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 12, 2016
182 So. 3d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Lane v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK LANE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 12, 2016

Citations

182 So. 3d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)