From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Fenn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1909
88 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued February 16, 1909

Decided March 2, 1909

Walter S. Hubbell for appellants.

Alton B. Parker, Frank Sullivan Smith, James M.E. O'Grady and Elbridge L. Adams for respondent.


Order affirming order denying motion to vacate order for examination affirmed, with costs, and first question certified answered in the affirmative. The other questions not answered, as they present questions of discretion, not of law.

Order affirming order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and HISCOCK, JJ.


Summaries of

Lane v. Fenn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 2, 1909
88 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Lane v. Fenn

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES M. LANE, Respondent, v . ALBERT O. FENN et al., Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 2, 1909

Citations

88 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1909)
88 N.E. 1123

Citing Cases

Realty Associates v. Hoage

In making our decisions, however, this court has, in fact, considered the question and concluded that of…